Cash surrender value of installment payments

Gatchalian Realty, Inc. vs. Angeles [November 27, 2013]

In Gatchalian Realty, Inc. v. Angeles, the Supreme Court ruled that for a seller to validly cancel a contract under the Maceda Law, they must provide a notarized notice of cancellation and refund the buyer’s cash surrender value. Failure to refund invalidates the cancellation, allowing the buyer to retain rights over the property.

Gatchalian Realty, Inc. vs. Angeles [November 27, 2013] Read More »

Jestra Development and Management Corp vs. Pacifico [January 30, 2007]

In Jestra Development and Management Corp. v. Pacifico, the Supreme Court ruled that under the Maceda Law, a buyer who has paid less than two years of installments is entitled to a 60-day grace period to settle overdue payments. Failure to pay within this period allows the seller to cancel the contract after proper notice.

Jestra Development and Management Corp vs. Pacifico [January 30, 2007] Read More »

Scroll to Top